Organized by Giulia Sissa, Professor of Political Science and Classics, UCLA
Virginity can be defined as a condition of sexual integrity, more specifically as the inexperience of full intercourse. This condition concerns mostly women before heterosexual coition. It involves corporeal, social, moral and emotional aspects. In modern Western anatomy, a thin piece of skin is allegedly located at the entrance of the vagina: its breakage is supposed to signify that penetration has occurred, whereas its integrity is supposed to bear witness to a woman’s sexual intactness. The reduction of virginity to a single anatomical part has always been highly controversial in Western medicine. The semiotic reliability and the very existence of the “hymen” have always been questioned.
The fact that the modern “hymen” is named after one of the generic words for “membrane” in ancient Greek may impair our understanding of the history of virginity. But it is a matter of textual fact that, although in Greece and Rome, virginity was acknowledged as the condition of a woman’s entire body, it was seen as a state of sexual inexperience. This did not require, however, the idea of a vaginal stopper, the so-called “hymen”. The controversy about the “hymen” begins in ancient medicine, where the existence of a natural sheet surrounding or covering the opening of the vagina was either ignored or forcefully denied. Hippocratic physicians never describe any such thing as a membrane that obstructs naturally the female sex. Soranus, a physician born in Ephesus, but active in Alexandria and Rome, at the beginning of the second century CE, does mention a transversal tissue sealing the vagina, but, in his opinion, this is merely a belief to be rejected as false, ψεῦδος.
This conference is intended to shed light on this crucial moment in late Antiquity, and to explore, in a multicultural world, the emergence of a more and more complex domain of knowledge in which the imperative to find signs of virginity